<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs and forums spam bots protection</title>
	<link>http://tech.tolero.org/blog/en/web/blogs-and-forums-spam-bots-protection</link>
	<description>My own opinion about technical stuff. Mostly linux depending tips.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tamlyn Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://tech.tolero.org/blog/en/web/blogs-and-forums-spam-bots-protection#comment-632</link>
		<author>Tamlyn Rhodes</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.tolero.org/blog/en/web/blogs-and-forums-spam-bots-protection#comment-632</guid>
					<description>Have you seen Bad Behavior? I've never used it but it's meant to be quite good and it is a bit like what you describe here: http://www.bad-behavior.ioerror.us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen Bad Behavior? I&#8217;ve never used it but it&#8217;s meant to be quite good and it is a bit like what you describe here: <a href="http://www.bad-behavior.ioerror.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.bad-behavior.ioerror.us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: povl</title>
		<link>http://tech.tolero.org/blog/en/web/blogs-and-forums-spam-bots-protection#comment-4545</link>
		<author>povl</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.tolero.org/blog/en/web/blogs-and-forums-spam-bots-protection#comment-4545</guid>
					<description>Hi
We want a qualified guess on how great is the % of spam coming from harvested adresses?

Regards

Povl Sørensen - Denmark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
We want a qualified guess on how great is the % of spam coming from harvested adresses?</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Povl Sørensen - Denmark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tolero</title>
		<link>http://tech.tolero.org/blog/en/web/blogs-and-forums-spam-bots-protection#comment-4546</link>
		<author>Tolero</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.tolero.org/blog/en/web/blogs-and-forums-spam-bots-protection#comment-4546</guid>
					<description>I measure the amount of spam at the value of 98%. For example, only this blog contains 100 good comments and 4439 comments recognized as spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I measure the amount of spam at the value of 98%. For example, only this blog contains 100 good comments and 4439 comments recognized as spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serge</title>
		<link>http://tech.tolero.org/blog/en/web/blogs-and-forums-spam-bots-protection#comment-4901</link>
		<author>Serge</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tech.tolero.org/blog/en/web/blogs-and-forums-spam-bots-protection#comment-4901</guid>
					<description>About #3.
There are several software utilities for automatic encoding HTML into JavaScript. I know spam blocker and web form spam protector, but the most complex and hard to decode results can be achieved with "web form anti-spam" utility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About #3.<br />
There are several software utilities for automatic encoding HTML into JavaScript. I know spam blocker and web form spam protector, but the most complex and hard to decode results can be achieved with &#8220;web form anti-spam&#8221; utility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
